i read bukowski\'s poetry & you were right with you assumption. i enjoyed it incredibly much so. galapagos is the only book i have read of vonnegut\'s thus far, but i agree with starting at the ending & working back from it. vonnegut would tell exactly what was going to transpire & then explain how, thoroughly. the way he created outside determining factors that led up to the ultimate destruction of mankind made me smile.
i had a discussion with a friend about survivor just the other day. palahniuk revealed that the main character survived the plane crash, but never wrote it in his book. the \'tape\' runs out. which is why i hated the book & why i loved the book.
i must ask, have you been able to read any of palahniuk\'s work yet? knowing you are a vonnegut fan i am curious as to how you would compare the two writers yourself.
north carolina you say? my brother and his wife live in havelock. his wife is pregnant and he is in iraq. so i might be moving out there for awhile to help her out. i am currently living in north bend, oregon. meth /obesity capital of the world. our county at least. bah. however, next month i will either be in havelock, cleveland, portland, seattle, san francisco, or el paso. choices. and those are only temporary. galapagos is one of my favorites that vonnegut wrote. palahniuk and vonnegut are similar in the way that they use sattire throughout their stories. i love it. i would suggest survivor, fight club, diary, invisible monsters, lullaby, choke, and any short stories you can get your hands on really. haha sorry i cant narrow it down. lullaby left quite an impression on me though. if you have seen fight club i would definitely suggest reading the book. the movie does not even compare!
yes indeed
punk is a good
genre to keep an
ear open to.
my bulletin picture
was found on
photobucket
actually. it took
a great deal of
searching to come
across. whoever
pieced it together is
quite good at what
they do. where are
you from?
miss.can.diss
i read bukowski\'s poetry & you were right with you
assumption. i enjoyed it incredibly much so. galapagos
is the only book i have read of vonnegut\'s thus far,
but i agree with starting at the ending & working back
from it. vonnegut would tell exactly what was going to
transpire & then explain how, thoroughly. the way he
created outside determining factors that led up to the
ultimate destruction of mankind made me smile. i
had a discussion with a friend about survivor just the
other day. palahniuk revealed that the main character
survived the plane crash, but never wrote it in his
book. the \'tape\' runs out. which is why i hated the
book & why i loved the book.
posted Aug 07
miss.can.diss
i must ask, have you been able to read any of
palahniuk\'s work yet? knowing you are a vonnegut fan i
am curious as to how you would compare the two writers
yourself.
posted Jul 25
miss.can.diss
north carolina you say? my brother and his wife live in
havelock. his wife is pregnant and he is in iraq. so i
might be moving out there for awhile to help her out. i
am currently living in north bend, oregon. meth
/obesity capital of the world. our county at least.
bah. however, next month i will either be in havelock,
cleveland, portland, seattle, san francisco, or el
paso. choices. and those are only temporary. galapagos
is one of my favorites that vonnegut wrote. palahniuk
and vonnegut are similar in the way that they use
sattire throughout their stories. i love it. i would
suggest survivor, fight club, diary, invisible
monsters, lullaby, choke, and any short stories you can
get your hands on really. haha sorry i cant narrow it
down. lullaby left quite an impression on me though. if
you have seen fight club i would definitely suggest
reading the book. the movie does not even compare!
posted May 17
miss.can.diss
yes indeed punk is a good genre to keep an ear open
to. my bulletin picture was found
on photobucket actually. it took a great deal
of searching to come across. whoever pieced it together
is quite good at what they do. where are you from?
posted May 15