Next »

addition Important, Body or Mind?

blog post



One of many hardest dogmas to interrupt in the present scientific paradigm is something called reductionism. Which is, chunking down things into smaller and smaller parts to be able to gain deeper insight into it�s nature. All sects of contemporary biology and medicine continue on this pursuit even though as a principle it was heavily challenged inside the 1920's with all the creation of Quantum Physics.


It�s as though the vast majority of scientific study has naively pushed it aside in support of the older and simpler model. The existing model is among expected outcomes. It states that each time a billiard ball hits another, the vector of both balls upon impact is predictable and measurable. Those laws of physics remain correct, nevertheless they are already super-ceded in certain areas and included with on other occasions.

Science, however, hasn't forgotten about the brand new paradigm altogether, instead it's got harnessed it�s principles to create some of the most useful and advanced technology seen in the world. Things such as MRI, wifi, bluetooth, computer chips, cellular devices and lot�s more have used the discoveries produced in early Last century through the pioneers with the new physics.

In biology, though, it�s largely been ignored by the mainstream researchers, so the old model remains as the gold-standard form of measurement and analyses. It�s reductionist system pulls things besides organism to system to organ to tissue to cell to molecule to electrical signal to atom last but not least subatomic particle. Out of this exploration, they are trying to peer ever-closer to where a thought originates.

They hope that by revealing smaller and much more detailed layers of life they are going to unlock the ultimate starting point of consciousness. They believe that reality is unfamiliar yet because our microscopes aren�t powerful enough. Continuing about this path with prove fruitless. Although insights as you go along have assembled many useful bits of the puzzle, the photo should never be 100% clear and complete that way alone.

The science of consciousness since it is being studied inside the mainstream currently by various neuroscientists has produced a good and clear comprehension of the way the a few mind assembles itself to offer what we should experience being a thinking mind.

Don�t do not understand, the vast array of neuropeptides, hormones, electrical signals, brain circuits and cellular interactions has generated an extremely impressive theory with the biology of consciousness.

What it didn't do, however, along with what it'll continue to fail at, is probing deep enough to find the origin of consciousness in the biological construct.

You won't ever flick around the TV or open a newspaper and listen to in regards to the latest journal article which has proclaimed to have seen a memory, or found an event, or visualised a colour, or witnessed creativity, or decoded a smell. These are all experiences in consciousness. Yes, they correlate to, but aren't restricted to the creativity of brain chemistry. We realize that whenever someone pulls out a memory, that the neurotransmitter called Acetylcholine is involved. But does that molecule contain an actual picture, smells, tastes, feelings and emotions of that memory or maybe it was just the answer to open the memory bank?

The very best the present scientific paradigm can give us is the perfect and much more detailed map. How much clarity of describing the landscape continue to demonstrate phenomenal accuracy, but we can't be able to fully recreate the landscape from your bunch of molecules and neuro-circuitry.

You cannot crack open someone�s head and pull out the precise picture of an experience. It�s not really in there. All of the necessary mechanisms to get it done are available, however. So in a state of delight including eating an item of chocolate, hearing a baby�s laughter or making love, you will have a cascade of Dopamine and other molecules released on the various emotional centres of the brain.

This pulsating cascade of molecules and electrics is surely certainly one of natures most breathtaking masterpieces of biological engineering.

The brain is the living transformer of consciousness into form.

It is biology�s translator of data into readable code, much like a television set allows visual information to appear by the observer. The complex circuitry within the TV is the channel-er with the signal. The characters, emotions, plots, sounds and scenery are not within the TV. They are competed through the device in a harmonious symphony of signal and scenery.

It�s a coupling of transmission and transmitted.

A decoding of invisible into visible.

A symbol with the unmanifest.

Our personal brain, the physical machinery, is like the tv screen set. It�s sophisticated circuitry may be the fantastic hardware which allows expression of spirit. Without our form, the unmanifest soul or spirit has no vehicle by which to generate expression.

A physique without spirit is comparable to a TV without an aerial. The signal was ever present, in mid-air as well as in the room between objects, but until that message has spot to channel it�s output, the spirit remains a potentiality in wave form. It collapses the wave into particles associated with and colour viewed by all they like to watch and listen.

The human spirit collapses into particles of dopamine in just a moment of delight and molecules of noradrenaline in just a minute of hysteria.

When the TV just isn't plugged into power, or there are missing and broken parts in the box, the signal can come out faulty, if. In order to create a concept in matter from that which was only a potential in spirit requires the intricacies of organic molecules and cells dancing in rhythmic measure.

Missing nutrients, excessive toxins, faulty wiring or invading organisms will disorder the finely honed signal transducer that's our brain.

This fact highlights and validates the notion of �healthy body - healthy mind�. They may be a coupled and inseparable pair. The magnificence of Mozart or perhaps the compassion of Mandela would never begin to see the light of day without spirit�s translation through matter.

To express one is superior to one other is nonsense. To study individually at the expense of another is much like pulling apart it and hoping to begin to see the movie inside. Or conversely attempting to explain the movie with regards to the vibrational megahertz waves in mid-air.

The best explanation we have to date is that spirit & matter (or body & mind) are in reality an interlinked and mutually dependent coupling of interactions. Neither has earthly relevance with no other. You've got a body to translate spirit, and you've got a spirit to bounce inside you.


Posted Aug 19, 2013 at 12:33pm