PureVolume

 
Next »
 
 

Land use feasibility analysis and why you need to go for one

blog post



Frequently the word “environmentalism” strikes a bad note with farms and industries that are powered by larger bodies of land. Many experts have equated with “tree-hugger” types who wish nothing more than to shut on the industrial operations of the us, bringing production to a full stop and inducing the lifestyle we are utilized to having to come to a rapid halt. On the flip side, “industrialism” has been viewed by its opponents as rampant, unchecked capitalism, that pollutes air, the water, takes exactly what it needs to function, and leaves a damaging mark. This for the purpose of turning massive profits that fill the pockets of corporate America and then leave behind it a dying earth. Perhaps both views are extremist, and we are not as far apart as some might think.

Land use feasibility

The industrial backbone of most nations in the last 100 years has been built firmly for the burning of petroleum products. The discovery of petroleum at the outset of the 20th century, along with the discovery of its many by-products allowed to add mass to machinery never before imagined. Mass output of all types of goods and services allowed for several things to occur. Everyone will have to judge regardless of whether these were good outcomes, but none-the-less, in short supply of a holocost we can never return.

Land use developers

Mass production and large-scale industry caused:
The specialization from the work force. Most people linked to industries began to specialize in their training and thinking, making them become very effective in their trade…..and very poor at others. This caused an inter-reliance of industries. Each population group specializing in one area were built with a need for goods or services provided by another.

The migration of farm workers towards the cities, and the expansion of large cities. Mechanization of farm labor required less dependence on farm workers to produce the food. In turn, exactly the same mechanization of industrial businesses gave rise for their need for more workers. Farm people left the rural areas and moved to the city, which promised a greater life in financial and recreational needs. Cities grew to incredible sizes, accommodating the housing and business requirements for the city. Export cities became common, because the productivity of America went beyond its own needs. Businesses saw the opportunity to sell products to other countries, and production continued to grow.

Production of non-necessities: Many businesses trying to carve their own niche invented and/or mass-produced exciting and new items for sale on the public. Basic needs appeared to be met, but both producers and consumers continued to want more conveniences (will that ever change?) therefore a host of new conveniences in communications, toys, trinkets, shoe, and more things than we're able to ever list got into production.

These are just many of the things created as a consequence of industrialism. As a result, a nation of men and women now believes which a cell phone, 5 pairs of trainers, a microwave, and a television are just some of the basic necessities of life. The us government agrees, and will provide welfare assist with people who cannot afford such “basics”.

The us now consumes 20 million barrels of crude oil each and every day, and that number is predicted to go up. In addition, the nation consumes over 1 billion a lot of coal and 22,375 billion cubic feet of gas every year. Other industrialized nations such as the European Union, Russia, and China are huge energy consumers at the same time.

Which brings us to the present problem: scientists always preach that there isn’t enough oil to last indefinitely. Predictions are typical over the board, from only 40 years to as high as 150 many years of remaining crude reserves. It's possible to argue that new reserves will likely be found, or the government is lying. We feel both of those are usually. But nonetheless, everyone virtually agrees that petroleum energies are being consumed and not put back. With this thought, it becomes important to adventure into the development of non-petroleum fuels (or alternative fuels) well ahead of schedule, in order to develop technologies that could replace petroleum use.

As we can see in recent pricing trends, petroleum prices continuously climb until other fuels DO become affordable. It merely gets to be a matter of plotting your individual graph on the pricing. Maybe solar powered energy is not feasible with $2.00/gallon gasoline, what if gasoline were $5.00? Why don't you consider if it were $10.00? Not having enough petroleum is not what will drive the price up…..it happens long before that. The population perception of running out of petroleum is the thing that drives future pricing. Anybody who observes the stock markets knows that when bad news happens about a corporation, stock instantly requires a dive. Why? Profits are rolling in just exactly the same. It is because of the public perception that profits will drop for the company, and nobody would like to be holding the stock. A mass sell-off by the public along with a reduced desire to own exactly the same results in a drop in price. In contrast, an increased desire and a perceived shortage will drive prices ever higher.

Regardless if you are a small farmette or an industry with 6 smoke stacks, the world thinks that rising energy costs will continue one of the most challenging obstacles of the 21st century. New inventions and concepts are needed that can promote and provide large scale energy products to be used in the industries in our nation. Perhaps you will not own a backyard alcohol still, but you may will be raising barley on an ethanol plant 20 miles away that creates a million gallons a day. Perhaps you are a steel worker that's turning out windmill frames that support huge windmills through the mid-west. Or maybe you are a niche industry which causes automobile circuit boards that merge the potency of the gasoline engine and electric motor (hybrid cars) under the hood of American automobiles. Each industry leading to the energy problem we face can make a small but growing contrast between keeping our cities running, or having mass starvation and blackouts that leave our cities as helpless as sitting ducks.

For those who have viewed our websites, you know that we have devoted a bit to alternative energy. The world thinks there could be immediate benefits to small business, and since we're a “grass roots” paper, we're looking at the energy problem much the same way. We can’t effectively do much to the world’s energy crisis, but we can easily get local inventors to begin thinking about the problem. Small enterprises and farms around PA can perhaps save themselves $100 per month by developing something either produces energy on their behalf, or reduces their need. Congress is giving a difficult look at the same thing, plus April they passed a power bill that was favorable to alternative developments. Additionally, it favors the resale of electricity back into the grid. You’re not likely to view cash, but many of the contracts let you an electricity credit. In the event you pump 1,000 kilowatts into the grid, you can get 1,000 free kw back to you at a later date. More rises within the cost of petroleum will spurn Congress to produce more incentives for engineers and inventors to assist convert America.

We believe that land industries is most likely the entrepreneurial base for energy designs. They’ve got the land, and often they have the equipment and technical resources. Small enterprises often have people with the drive and ingenuity to reinvent the wheel----and can easily “come in under the wire” politically, thus avoiding the pressures of high-power lobbyists, funded by petroleum fuel companies to convince the general public that everything is OK.

Where do environmentalists fit it? Most of them have urged sustainable energy development for decades, and will also be at the forefront of the ingenious technologies that America probably will produce. Others might find the benefits of slowly moving the world away from petroleum usage, intended for earthly contaminants and political unrest among nations. They're going to also continue to be “pollution watchdogs”, ensuring new technologies do not damage our universe even worse than what we have now.

It is important to remember that most energy production (i.e. energy use) pollutes the surroundings. Reduction of pollutants is a more realistic goal than elimination. For instance, ethanol technology may design a plant that creates ethanol by burning coal for the energy and have a positive energy gain with reduced emissions per btu. Maybe leveling 1,000 acres of federal forest land for solar collectors puts enough electric inside the grid to offset the loss of the trees. What energy industries will target is creating a net gain in energy production; environmentally, people should accept technology that produce less negative impacts than the old system did. New systems need not be “ideal” when starting out….they just need to be an environmental improvement over older systems. There are numerous factors that weigh in, including political ones. For example, it may cost a certain amount of money to refine a million barrels of crude, but it might also cost $100 billion every Decade for a war to maintain the crude supply secure. (Ya think our war machine pollutes a bit?) Many, many factors must weigh straight into final decisions in embracing new technology, and we're confident that environmental leaders within this country have the capacity to think beyond their bare feet inside the tulips.

If one looks with enough contentration, nearly every human action causes pollution. When a shaft spins in a bearing, it causes heat, along with a purist could claim that this will cause global warming. For all of our sakes, please get a grip. Cooperation between environmentalism and techs will be imperative so that you can bring better technologies on-line. As we’ve stated before, the human being footprint is huge, plus it cannot be undone. As stewards with the land, we must pro-actively seek better ways to create the power we need to perform work. Rising prices might be a constant reminder of the. American ingenuity has always faced its task and succeeded. We presume that the greatest nation on the planet can meet this challenge as well.

 

Posted Jan 04, 2016 at 7:41am

0 likes

 

Comments

 
 
1